Twenty-five years of Burma's victory!{Aung San Suu Kyi: I don't celebrate the defeat of the opponent.

This is a moment of Burma's shock.The opposition National League for Democracy (NLD), led by Aung San Suu Kyi, won 70 percent of the vote and won an absolute majority in parliament.Htay Oo, acting chairman of the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), conceded defeat and said "we lose, and we will not accept the results."Former chairman Riemann conceded defeat in Facebook.

Aung San Suu Kyi gave a vegetarian address earlier in the day, not to be overbearing and to remind voters to look at the election in a normal way, not to provoke an adversary." It may be too early to celebrate the victory, even though we all know the inevitable result!But let me remind you that the defeated candidates have to accept the results of the election, and the candidates winning the election do not want to upset the losers. It is not our intention to make the other party feel bad."

This is the first openly democratic national election in Myanmar in 25 years, and the ruling party's unworthy bow and is about to usher in the dawn of democracy in Burma, which has been under the rule of the military regime.The elected members of Congress will take office in February 2016 and are expected to elect a president in March.If the election results in a smooth transfer of political parties, this will be the first democratic regime in the country since 1960.

The Burmese military regime did not follow the example of public opinion in the past.In 1990, the National League, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, won the parliamentary election. The result was denied by the military regime. Aung San Suu Kyi was placed under house arrest. The next year she was awarded Nobel Peace Prize, her homeland remains limited.In 2007, the Burmese government issued a constitution that states that "spouses and children are not president" to block Suu Kyi's presidential route, which is dubbed the "Aung San Suu Kyi clause".

In this election, the world is watching. Do we want to know that Myanmar is waiting for the democracy that they are waiting for?In the face of many obstacles, Aung San Suu Kyi is not disheartenable, she shows her determination to face the military junta's gun, and the Burmese does not despair. They shout out the Myanmar they want, saying that the military regime is now up, and we want a more transparent and free future. We want to lead the country forward in a way that is more transparent.(sibling: "I have no parents, no husbands, no children, and I dream of the country as my most favorite dream" South Korea's first female president, Magnu Kehui)

Aung San Suu Kyi: "Separation of the family is the price I have to pay for my freedom"

In 1988, Aung San Suu Kyi made her first public address on the stairs of the Grand Tower in Yangon, where she expressed her wish for democracy and disappointment with the current situation in Myanmar.She said, "As the daughter of Aung San Suu Kyi, I cannot be indifferent to what happened in Burma. The crisis before us is the second time that Burma's independence struggle."" People have known the daughter of Aung San Suu Kyi, and she is no longer the daughter of Aung San Suu Kyi.

Immediately after she set up a coalition, the people of Burma began to have a credible direction, and the 1990 election was not recognized, only to prove the despicable tenacity of the junta, but she survived the government's long period of house arrest in 1993. She wrote in her diary that "the family's years of separation is the price I have to pay for my freedom."" (Recommended reading: Give the family's definition back to the loved one

By 2010, she ended her long house arrest and freed her freedom, and by 2015, the National League won 70 % of the seats.The victory of the so-called 25-year period is in fact such a weight.There is too much pain behind the victory, and Aung San Suu Kyi has softly lowered her own responsibility for freedom in the country, by gently putting aside his own happy family.

San Suu Kyi's biography a very naked one, "Madame, who can choose to make choices, to have a husband and a child, or a country in which it is a country?""I look back at the path of Aung San Suu Kyi, and I suddenly felt that she might not deliberately choose who, but what she wants to choose is a better future for all."